In the short essay
by David Eggers, the author’s perspective on the woman photographer is
very poignant. The vignette take place when the woman just got off work from
her book publishing company, she is sitting in a car at a poor neighborhood,
trying to catch some trenchant pictures about underclass people. The text
distinctively implied that, photographers sometime take very little time to get
to know the subject they choose to take the photograph with. The author uses
“for hypocrisy and the exploitation of the underclass”, to show that the woman
instead of getting to know what is really happening in the underclass people’s
life, she comes to the place far across the street, and shoot picture from a
distance. Pretending she have a good eye for the injustice of life. The word “Go-Gatters”
show up a few times in this short text, first it introduced us the place where
she choose to take pictures. The author told us how she feels about the
name, “ finds it interesting, “because it is clear that the customers of the
market are anything but”. In the last
time “Go-Getters” appears is when the author sarcastically tells us how people
will see her artworks. The final sentence to me feels like the most interesting
sentence of the whole essay. The final sentence put the whole essay into one whole
piece, it indicates how the author feels
about the hypocritical behavior of the woman photographer. The new idea on the last sentence surprise me,
of how the author sees the artwork from his point of view. I think what the
author trying to say was that, artist should really get to know their art subject,
not from a distance, but from close up. Knowing and feeling the subject is the only way to not be
hypocritical about the work you make.
What an interesting observation. I also noted the hypocrisy in her behavior in her work as well. Although I didn't take into consideration myself that the hypocrisy didn't just lie with what she was attempting to deliver a message of, but of the work itself. Nice work! :)
ReplyDelete